A Critical Examination of Corporate Virtue Signaling While Fueling Genocide
"Your favorite 'sustainable' bank is likely processing payments for attack helicopters while claiming to hit UN goals. It’s time to stop pretending ESG reports mean anything if they don't include a refusal to bankroll a genocide."
So here's the thing about the modern financial system: everybody's got a sustainability report. Everybody's committed to ESG. Everybody's signed up for the UN Sustainable Development Goals. And everybody—and I mean everybody—is full of it.
You want to know what real "stakeholder capitalism" looks like? It looks like Singapore-listed companies are paying $5.57 million to Myanmar's military since the coup, while the junta bombs schools, murders children, and displaces millions. It looks like Thai banks are processing payments for attack helicopters while publishing glossy reports about their commitment to "responsible banking." It looks like India is sending election observers to legitimize a sham election while simultaneously shipping military equipment to the generals doing the killing.
Let me break this down for you, because the level of hypocrisy here is so staggering it would make even the most cynical among us blush.
The Singapore Shuffle
Singapore—that gleaming city-state of efficiency and order, that beacon of Asian values and good governance—has been one of Myanmar's top foreign investors. Between October 2021 and February 2022 alone, Singapore companies pumped $277 million into Myanmar. That's more than any other country. More than China. More than anyone.
And here's the beautiful part: they did this while the military was actively committing what the UN calls "crimes against humanity." The company Emerging Towns & Cities (ETC) has been particularly industrious, paying the Myanmar army's Office of the Quartermaster General—you know, the folks procuring ammunition, bombs, and jet fuel for genocide—millions of dollars for a real estate deal on military land.
When this came to light, what happened? Singapore Stock Exchange suspended trading. ETC commissioned "independent reviews." They found that payments were made "verbally" with "no formal written invoices" at below-market exchange rates. In other words, they were deliberately obscuring war crime financing through creative accounting.
The punchline? ETC "divested" by selling to Grand Ally Pte Ltd—a Singapore company set up by ETC's own executives. It's like selling your drug money to your cousin and calling yourself reformed. But hey, they filed the paperwork, so it's all legal, right?
Singapore authorities tout their commitment to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. They've issued "sanctions guidance." They've investigated companies. And yet, as of 2024, ETC was still paying the Myanmar military. Grand Ally is still registered in Singapore. The money still flows.
The Thai Banking Bonanza
Thailand deserves special recognition in this hall of shame. While Singapore at least pretended to care when caught, Thailand's banks have gone full steam ahead.
According to the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in Myanmar, five major Thai banks facilitated weapons transactions for the junta in 2024. We're talking about payments for overhauling Mi-35p attack helicopters, components for MiG-29 fighter jets, and K-8W light attack aircraft. Between April 2022 and March 2024, weapons trade through Thailand doubled from $60 million to over $120 million.
When confronted, Siam Commercial Bank denied everything, claiming the transactions weren't "connected to the arms trade" and that they perform due diligence. This is like a getaway driver saying he had no idea the bank was being robbed—he thought his passengers were just making a really urgent withdrawal.
Thai companies also supplied $80 million in aviation fuel to the junta. You know what aviation fuel is used for? Flying planes. You know what the Myanmar military uses planes for? Bombing civilians. Airstrikes against civilian targets increased fivefold in the six months leading up to the UN report. But sure, Thai banks, keep processing those transactions. Your ESG reports look fantastic.
India's Democratic Doublespeak
India—the world's largest democracy—presents perhaps the most galling hypocrisy. While publishing reports about its commitment to human rights and democratic values, India has:
-
Supplied military equipment, infrastructure, and training to the junta
-
Allowed the junta to participate in BIMSTEC summits
-
Sent election observers to Myanmar's 2025 sham election, lending democratic credibility to a fundamentally undemocratic farce where all opposition parties are banned
Prime Minister Modi's government framed this as "supporting democratic processes." In reality, it's like sending election observers to a prison where the warden is the only candidate and calling it democracy.
Indian companies also play a crucial role in the jet fuel supply chain that powers the junta's bombing campaigns. Swan Energy, an Indian conglomerate with murky ties to Gautam Adani's investment funds, has been central to aviation fuel deliveries. This is the same fuel used to bomb schools, hospitals, and refugee camps.
China and Russia: At Least They're Honest
Here's the thing about China and Russia: they never pretended to care about human rights. China has supplied $267 million in weapons since the coup. Russia has provided over $400 million. Together, they account for two-thirds of the $1 billion in arms imported by the junta since 2021.
China South Industries Corporation (CSIC) is helping the junta produce aerial bombs. Chinese state-owned NORINCO supplies weapons. China is the predominant supplier of drones—the junta's weapon of choice against ethnic armed groups and resistance forces.
Russia's relationship with the junta has only intensified. Min Aung Hlaing has visited Russia seven times since 2021, including four visits in the first nine months of 2025. They're helping Myanmar pursue nuclear power ambitions. They're supplying jet fighters and advanced drones.
But here's the difference: China and Russia never published ESG reports claiming to respect human rights. They never signed pledges about responsible business conduct. They're arms dealers who act like arms dealers. There's a certain brutal honesty to it.
👉 Follow Robert Rubinstein for more
Read Full Article
